The BJP fought the 16th general elections on
‘development agenda’, so it claims yet it was obvious that communalism and
anti-Muslim rhetoric was the flipside to the landslide. The electoral slogans postured the
middleclass who were craving for more and faster development as if it can be
reaped from standing rice fields.
Development has to happen first before its benefits are realised, and it
is a tough and long process. However,
while the urban middleclass was enamoured with BJP’s overtures, the catalytic
was the communal undertones expressed in cryptic double meaning statements,
body language including colour codes, surrogate sibling overtures (of VHP,
Bhajrangdal and other ilks), and engineered communal riots. Sociological and applied economic
analysis have supported a trend that religious assertion and glorification of
social identity increases as the income levels increase.
The UPA was
seen by this influential electorate as more pro-poor and pro-minority. It is another essay as to why the Indian
middleclass postures are anti-poor and anti-minority. Suffice to stress that
the newly elected government cannot take such a stand not only due to the
compulsions of constitutional guarantees but also demands of the development
strategy itself. Given the history of
deep and extensive poverty incidence in India, the BJP government must follow
and improve the well laid out policies of poverty alleviation, religious and
social inclusion.
BJP’s good luck
was the segmented voting behaviour in India. BJP won 280 or 51% of MPs with
only 31% of popular votes. In many respects this is the fallacy of India’s
democratic system. Although now that BJP is at the helm of power along with
ultra-fringe parties such as the Shiva Sena; it cannot absolve itself from
addressing the issue of poverty and inclusiveness head on.
The electoral victory
speeches, the annual budget presentation and the customary Independence Day
speech of the Prime Minister all taken together do highlight the vision of the
BJP government with respect to poverty and inclusion. The importance of having toilets
near homes cannot be overemphasised, yet culturally its usage is easy said than
done. Similarly providing bank accounts to all in rural and urban area is a
noble idea to effect inclusiveness, but such accounts are intended to
distribute funds not accumulate savings and turn it in to investments.
However, so far
there is a lack of emphasis on provisioning of quality and affordable health
care to the masses, improving quality of elementary education. Extending
educational infrastructure to minority (Muslim) concentrated areas is
absolutely essential to achieve the dream of universal literacy. Given the
dominance of agriculture, aspects of land reforms and property rights are not
even mentioned let alone make it a priority which is essential to augment
investments in agricultural and improve productivity. There has to be clear emphasis on mechanism
to improve the MG-NREGA and implementation of the Food Security Act requires
greater government attention than the development rhetoric. Often the deep excluded geographic areas are
even excluded in the review and evaluation exercises - most of the government
initiated and controlled studies do not meet the methodological standards of
the modern evaluation and assessments.
Shooting down the planning commission and
replacing it with a committee of economist will centralize the power in to
bureaucracy and it a signal towards non-participation of state in nation
building. The Planning Commission was amenable to interacting with domestic researchers
and ideas carried forward from multi-lateral institutions. The Bhagwatis and Panagariays of this world I
am afraid are too trigger happy to shoot down the equity polices of India. It
is time that the new government must review immediately the progress in the
millennium development goals, human development and poverty alleviation.
Further such review and assessment must be undertaken at the level of the
district and states.
It
is therefore, essential that the BJP government understand unique and intricate
relationship between poverty alleviation, inclusiveness and development and ensure
that the future social and economic transformation must happen through the
process of education and cultural change. In this context two noteworthy
situations that inevitably evolve needs to be highlighted. Sectoral (economic)
imbalances favouring the modern technology and large manufacturing will receive
a much needed boost. Yet what will happen is that millions of workforce trapped
in low productive sectors such as farming, traditional artisanship, small
business and manual labour would face an extraordinary risk, should the new
government ignore their plight in its immediate policy formulation. Secondly,
the fiscal pressure and also some ideological difference may promote frugality
of social services and social subsidies. This will be an immediate threat to
millions of the vulnerable and deprived communities who will face increase in hunger,
deepening of poverty amongst selected social groups and geographic areas as
well as continued health vulnerabilities.
As a long term
strategy the BJP government must initiate immediate actions to ensure inclusive
decision making at the local levels namely the panchayats and town-municipalities with nominations of the excluded
groups such as the minorities. Envisioning an ‘equal opportunity policy’ and establishing
an independent ‘Equal Opportunity Commission’ will go a long way in
dispassionately addressing the issue of exclusion in India.
No comments:
Post a Comment